A structured framework for objectively evaluating AI agent platforms across eight critical dimensions—from no-code building to enterprise security—enabling confident, criteria-driven decisions for your customer experience technology investments.
A drag-and-drop interface that allows non-technical users to create and modify AI agent workflows or teams of Agents without writing code.
Look for visual workflow builders, flowchart-style interfaces, or GUI-based agent configuration tools. Must be accessible to business users, not just developers.
Zapier-style workflow builders
Microsoft Power Platform-like interfaces
Visual conversation flow designers
Agents Configurable via Developer SDK
Comprehensive software development kits that provide pre-built functions, classes, and utilities for building AI agents programmatically. This would not include SDKs for just talking to or using agents or AI functionality, it must be an SDK, typically TypeScript or Python, that fully defines how an agent works and what it does in a declarative way.
Must include documentation, code examples, and framework support (like React, FastAPI, etc.). Look for official SDKs, not just API wrappers.
Official npm packages
PyPI packages
GitHub repositories with framework integrations
2-way sync between code and UI
Changes made in the visual builder automatically update the underlying code, and code changes reflect in the UI interface.
Must demonstrate bidirectional synchronization. Changes in either interface should be reflected in the other without data loss.
Export to code from visual builder
Import code changes back to visual interface
No-code visual builder to build agents
A drag-and-drop interface that allows non-technical users to create and modify AI agent workflows or teams of Agents without writing code.
Evaluation Criteria
Look for visual workflow builders, flowchart-style interfaces, or GUI-based agent configuration tools. Must be accessible to business users, not just developers.
Examples
Zapier-style workflow builders
Microsoft Power Platform-like interfaces
Visual conversation flow designers
Agents Configurable via Developer SDK
Comprehensive software development kits that provide pre-built functions, classes, and utilities for building AI agents programmatically. This would not include SDKs for just talking to or using agents or AI functionality, it must be an SDK, typically TypeScript or Python, that fully defines how an agent works and what it does in a declarative way.
Evaluation Criteria
Must include documentation, code examples, and framework support (like React, FastAPI, etc.). Look for official SDKs, not just API wrappers.
Examples
Official npm packages
PyPI packages
GitHub repositories with framework integrations
2-way sync between code and UI
Changes made in the visual builder automatically update the underlying code, and code changes reflect in the UI interface.
Evaluation Criteria
Must demonstrate bidirectional synchronization. Changes in either interface should be reflected in the other without data loss.
Support for Model Context Protocol servers, enabling standardized tool and data source integrations.
Must explicitly support MCP protocol or demonstrate compatibility with MCP servers. Look for MCP-specific documentation or integrations.
MCP server integrations
MCP protocol support documentation
Standardized tool interfaces
Multi-agent Architecture
Systems that coordinate multiple specialized agents using graph-based workflows or decision trees.
Must support multiple agents working together with defined relationships and handoff logic. Look for visual workflow representations or agent collaboration features.
Agent workflow diagrams
Specialist agent routing
Multi-agent conversations
Task delegation systems
Multi-agent Coordination
Support for both delegating tasks to sub-agents while maintaining control, and fully handing off conversations to specialized agents.
Must demonstrate both patterns - delegation (supervisor remains involved) and handoff (full transfer of control). Should show clear examples of each.
Supervisor agents delegating to specialists
Seamless handoffs between support tiers
Escalation workflows with different control patterns
Talk to Agents via A2A, MCP, and Vercel AI SDK formats
Direct communication channels between agents without human intervention, enabling collaborative problem-solving.
Must show agents communicating directly with each other, sharing context, or collaborating on tasks. Should be more than just sequential workflows.
Agents sharing findings
Collaborative problem-solving
Peer-to-peer agent communication
Agent consensus mechanisms
Agent Credential and Permissions Management
Individual authentication and authorization systems for each agent, allowing different access levels and API keys.
Must allow different agents to have different credentials, API keys, or access permissions. Should support credential isolation and management.
Agent-specific API key management
Individual service account assignments
Per-agent permission systems
Agent traces in UI + OpenTelemetry
Detailed logging and tracing of agent actions with visual interfaces and industry-standard telemetry.
Must provide visual trace interfaces showing agent decision-making and support OpenTelemetry standards for observability.
Agent decision trees in UI
OpenTelemetry integration
Distributed tracing
Agent performance monitoring
Take actions on any MCP Server, App, or API
Support for Model Context Protocol servers, enabling standardized tool and data source integrations.
Evaluation Criteria
Must explicitly support MCP protocol or demonstrate compatibility with MCP servers. Look for MCP-specific documentation or integrations.
Examples
MCP server integrations
MCP protocol support documentation
Standardized tool interfaces
Multi-agent Architecture
Systems that coordinate multiple specialized agents using graph-based workflows or decision trees.
Evaluation Criteria
Must support multiple agents working together with defined relationships and handoff logic. Look for visual workflow representations or agent collaboration features.
Examples
Agent workflow diagrams
Specialist agent routing
Multi-agent conversations
Task delegation systems
Multi-agent Coordination
Support for both delegating tasks to sub-agents while maintaining control, and fully handing off conversations to specialized agents.
Evaluation Criteria
Must demonstrate both patterns - delegation (supervisor remains involved) and handoff (full transfer of control). Should show clear examples of each.
Examples
Supervisor agents delegating to specialists
Seamless handoffs between support tiers
Escalation workflows with different control patterns
Talk to Agents via A2A, MCP, and Vercel AI SDK formats
Direct communication channels between agents without human intervention, enabling collaborative problem-solving.
Evaluation Criteria
Must show agents communicating directly with each other, sharing context, or collaborating on tasks. Should be more than just sequential workflows.
Examples
Agents sharing findings
Collaborative problem-solving
Peer-to-peer agent communication
Agent consensus mechanisms
Agent Credential and Permissions Management
Individual authentication and authorization systems for each agent, allowing different access levels and API keys.
Evaluation Criteria
Must allow different agents to have different credentials, API keys, or access permissions. Should support credential isolation and management.
Examples
Agent-specific API key management
Individual service account assignments
Per-agent permission systems
Agent traces in UI + OpenTelemetry
Detailed logging and tracing of agent actions with visual interfaces and industry-standard telemetry.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide visual trace interfaces showing agent decision-making and support OpenTelemetry standards for observability.
Automated ingestion of public sources (docs, help center, etc.)
Systems that automatically discover, crawl, and index publicly available information sources.
Look for web crawling capabilities, RSS feed ingestion, public API integrations, or automated content discovery. Must be ongoing, not one-time imports.
Website crawling
Documentation site ingestion
Public forum monitoring
News feed integration
Automated ingestion of private sources (Notion/Confluence)
Direct integrations that automatically sync content from private knowledge management systems.
Must have native integrations (not just manual uploads) with popular enterprise tools. Should handle permissions and access controls.
Notion API integration
Confluence Cloud connector
SharePoint sync
Google Drive integration
Optimized RAG with managed retrieval
Advanced retrieval-augmented generation with intelligent chunking, embedding optimization, and relevance scoring.
Look for advanced RAG features like semantic chunking, hybrid search, relevance tuning, or retrieval optimization. Must be more sophisticated than basic vector search.
Hybrid search (semantic + keyword)
Relevance tuning interfaces
Chunk optimization
Retrieval analytics
Real-time fetch from any database/API/web
Ability to query live data sources during conversations, not just pre-indexed static content.
Must demonstrate live API calls, database queries, or web scraping during agent interactions. Should handle authentication and rate limiting.
Live inventory lookups
Real-time pricing queries
Current weather data
Live database queries
Self-updating knowledge base
Automated systems that refresh and update the agent's knowledge (from internal & external sources like website & docs) without manual intervention.
Look for scheduled updates, webhook-based updates, or real-time syncing with data sources. Must handle changes automatically.
Auto-sync with documentation sites
Scheduled database refreshes
Webhook integrations for content updates
Automated ingestion of public sources (docs, help center, etc.)
Systems that automatically discover, crawl, and index publicly available information sources.
Evaluation Criteria
Look for web crawling capabilities, RSS feed ingestion, public API integrations, or automated content discovery. Must be ongoing, not one-time imports.
Examples
Website crawling
Documentation site ingestion
Public forum monitoring
News feed integration
Automated ingestion of private sources (Notion/Confluence)
Direct integrations that automatically sync content from private knowledge management systems.
Evaluation Criteria
Must have native integrations (not just manual uploads) with popular enterprise tools. Should handle permissions and access controls.
Examples
Notion API integration
Confluence Cloud connector
SharePoint sync
Google Drive integration
Optimized RAG with managed retrieval
Advanced retrieval-augmented generation with intelligent chunking, embedding optimization, and relevance scoring.
Evaluation Criteria
Look for advanced RAG features like semantic chunking, hybrid search, relevance tuning, or retrieval optimization. Must be more sophisticated than basic vector search.
Examples
Hybrid search (semantic + keyword)
Relevance tuning interfaces
Chunk optimization
Retrieval analytics
Real-time fetch from any database/API/web
Ability to query live data sources during conversations, not just pre-indexed static content.
Evaluation Criteria
Must demonstrate live API calls, database queries, or web scraping during agent interactions. Should handle authentication and rate limiting.
Examples
Live inventory lookups
Real-time pricing queries
Current weather data
Live database queries
Self-updating knowledge base
Automated systems that refresh and update the agent's knowledge (from internal & external sources like website & docs) without manual intervention.
Evaluation Criteria
Look for scheduled updates, webhook-based updates, or real-time syncing with data sources. Must handle changes automatically.
AI agents are callable inside Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor via each platform's native tool/action interface and can execute at least workflows end-to-end.
Evidence of a working, documented integration: official listing/docs + runnable setup + a successful end-to-end workflow in the target surface (no "theoretical support").
Cursor editor extension or MCP that triggers the agent
Slack and Discord
Native bot integrations that let agents run tasks, respond, and interact within team chats (not just webhooks).
Must include native bot apps with rich, interactive features (slash commands, buttons, threads). One or more workflows must run fully inside Slack/Discord with proper auth and error handling.
Slack bot app with /command support
Interactive messages and channel triggers
Discord bot that responds to slash commands
Zendesk, Salesforce, and any Support Platform
Direct integrations with major CRM and customer service platforms for seamless workflow integration.
Must provide native integrations with ticket creation, customer data access, or workflow automation. Should be more than just API connections.
Zendesk ticket integration
Salesforce case management
CRM data synchronization
Workflow automation
Product Expert Chat Bubble ("Ask AI")
Dedicated conversational AI Agent for customer support that knows everything about the product and company that can search, cite, and handoff questions to other support questions when needed.
Must be able to be based on indexed data in a company's internal and external docs. Must be fully configurable for control and customization.
Inkeep Ask AI support feature
Answers with Inline Citations
Responses that include specific references to source documents with clickable links or clear attribution.
Must provide traceable sources for generated content. Look for clickable links, document references, or clear source attribution in responses.
Footnote-style citations
Inline source links
"According to [document]" attributions
Source confidence scores
Guardrails
Safety mechanisms that prevent inappropriate responses and confidence thresholds that trigger human escalation.
Must include content filtering, response confidence scoring, and automatic escalation when confidence is low. Should show safety mechanisms in action.
Advanced search capabilities that understand context and meaning, not just keyword matching.
Must demonstrate semantic search capabilities across enterprise data sources with relevance ranking and context understanding.
Natural language search interfaces
Semantic relevance scoring
Cross-platform search capabilities
Search analytics
Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor
AI agents are callable inside Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor via each platform's native tool/action interface and can execute at least workflows end-to-end.
Evaluation Criteria
Evidence of a working, documented integration: official listing/docs + runnable setup + a successful end-to-end workflow in the target surface (no "theoretical support").
Cursor editor extension or MCP that triggers the agent
Slack and Discord
Native bot integrations that let agents run tasks, respond, and interact within team chats (not just webhooks).
Evaluation Criteria
Must include native bot apps with rich, interactive features (slash commands, buttons, threads). One or more workflows must run fully inside Slack/Discord with proper auth and error handling.
Examples
Slack bot app with /command support
Interactive messages and channel triggers
Discord bot that responds to slash commands
Zendesk, Salesforce, and any Support Platform
Direct integrations with major CRM and customer service platforms for seamless workflow integration.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide native integrations with ticket creation, customer data access, or workflow automation. Should be more than just API connections.
Examples
Zendesk ticket integration
Salesforce case management
CRM data synchronization
Workflow automation
Product Expert Chat Bubble ("Ask AI")
Dedicated conversational AI Agent for customer support that knows everything about the product and company that can search, cite, and handoff questions to other support questions when needed.
Evaluation Criteria
Must be able to be based on indexed data in a company's internal and external docs. Must be fully configurable for control and customization.
Examples
Inkeep Ask AI support feature
Answers with Inline Citations
Responses that include specific references to source documents with clickable links or clear attribution.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide traceable sources for generated content. Look for clickable links, document references, or clear source attribution in responses.
Examples
Footnote-style citations
Inline source links
"According to [document]" attributions
Source confidence scores
Guardrails
Safety mechanisms that prevent inappropriate responses and confidence thresholds that trigger human escalation.
Evaluation Criteria
Must include content filtering, response confidence scoring, and automatic escalation when confidence is low. Should show safety mechanisms in action.
Built-in capabilities for automated generation of documentation or marketing copy, documentation based on product gaps and feature gaps discovered by AI Agents.
Must include AI content generation features specifically designed for creating new content automatically based on feature gaps and knowledge base gaps.
Auto-generated documentation drafts
Content suggestions based on gaps
AI-written FAQ entries
AI Reports on Knowledge Gaps
Analytics that identify what information is missing from the knowledge base.
Must provide insights into unanswered questions, missing information. Should include actionable recommendations.
"Unanswered questions" reports
Knowledge gap analytics
Content improvement suggestions
AI Reports on Product Feature Gaps
Analytics that identify what information is missing from the knowledge base or what features users are requesting.
Must provide insights into unanswered questions, missing information, or feature requests. Should include actionable recommendations.
Feature request tracking
User feedback aggregation
Product improvement suggestions
Automatic Content Updates (AI Content Writer)
Built-in capabilities for automated generation of documentation or marketing copy, documentation based on product gaps and feature gaps discovered by AI Agents.
Evaluation Criteria
Must include AI content generation features specifically designed for creating new content automatically based on feature gaps and knowledge base gaps.
Examples
Auto-generated documentation drafts
Content suggestions based on gaps
AI-written FAQ entries
AI Reports on Knowledge Gaps
Analytics that identify what information is missing from the knowledge base.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide insights into unanswered questions, missing information. Should include actionable recommendations.
Examples
"Unanswered questions" reports
Knowledge gap analytics
Content improvement suggestions
AI Reports on Product Feature Gaps
Analytics that identify what information is missing from the knowledge base or what features users are requesting.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide insights into unanswered questions, missing information, or feature requests. Should include actionable recommendations.
Pre-built, customizable JS user interface components that can be embedded in AI Agents chats.
Must provide actual JavaScript components, not just embeddable widgets specifically for AI Agent UI Chats. Should include customization options and documentation.
npm packages with JavaScript components
Embeddable chat widgets with customization APIs
Out-of-box Chat Components (React)
Pre-built, customizable React user interface components that can be embedded in AI Agents chats.
Must provide actual React components, not just embeddable widgets specifically for AI Agent UI Chats. Should include customization options and documentation.
npm packages with React components
Embeddable chat widgets with customization APIs
Interactive Components within Agent Messages (forms, cards, etc.)
UI elements that allow users to interact beyond simple text chat, including forms, buttons, cards, and other rich interactions.
Must support interactive elements within the chat interface. Look for form handling, button actions, card-based responses, and rich media support.
In-chat forms for data collection
Interactive buttons for quick responses
Carousel cards
File upload capabilities
Custom UIs using Vercel AI SDK format
Compatibility with Vercel's AI SDK formats and streaming protocols for web applications.
Must support Vercel AI SDK formats, streaming responses, or demonstrate integration with Vercel ecosystem. Look for specific SDK compatibility.
Vercel AI SDK integration examples
Streaming response support
Next.js compatibility
Vercel deployment guides
Out-of-box Chat Components (JavaScript)
Pre-built, customizable JS user interface components that can be embedded in AI Agents chats.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide actual JavaScript components, not just embeddable widgets specifically for AI Agent UI Chats. Should include customization options and documentation.
Examples
npm packages with JavaScript components
Embeddable chat widgets with customization APIs
Out-of-box Chat Components (React)
Pre-built, customizable React user interface components that can be embedded in AI Agents chats.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide actual React components, not just embeddable widgets specifically for AI Agent UI Chats. Should include customization options and documentation.
Examples
npm packages with React components
Embeddable chat widgets with customization APIs
Interactive Components within Agent Messages (forms, cards, etc.)
UI elements that allow users to interact beyond simple text chat, including forms, buttons, cards, and other rich interactions.
Evaluation Criteria
Must support interactive elements within the chat interface. Look for form handling, button actions, card-based responses, and rich media support.
Examples
In-chat forms for data collection
Interactive buttons for quick responses
Carousel cards
File upload capabilities
Custom UIs using Vercel AI SDK format
Compatibility with Vercel's AI SDK formats and streaming protocols for web applications.
Evaluation Criteria
Must support Vercel AI SDK formats, streaming responses, or demonstrate integration with Vercel ecosystem. Look for specific SDK compatibility.
Automated systems that detect and remove personally identifiable information from conversations and data.
Must demonstrate active PII detection and removal, not just data masking. Should include multiple PII types and configurable policies.
PII detection algorithms
Automatic redaction features
Data anonymization tools
Privacy policy enforcement
Uptime & support SLAs
Contractual commitments to system availability and support response times with measurable guarantees.
Must provide specific uptime percentages and support response time commitments. Look for SLA documentation and performance reporting.
99.9% uptime guarantees
24/7 support commitments
Response time SLAs
Performance dashboards
SOC2 Type II certified
Successfully completed SOC 2 Type II audit demonstrating operational effectiveness of security controls over time.
Must have valid SOC 2 Type II certification, not just SOC 2 Type I. Look for recent audit reports or compliance badges.
SOC 2 Type II certificates
Compliance page documentation
Third-party attestations
GDPR/HIPAA compliant options
Platform configurations and features that enable compliance with data privacy and healthcare regulations.
Must provide specific compliance features, not just general security. Look for data processing agreements, privacy controls, and compliance documentation.
Data processing agreements
Privacy control features
HIPAA business associate agreements
GDPR compliance guides
PII removal capabilities
Automated systems that detect and remove personally identifiable information from conversations and data.
Evaluation Criteria
Must demonstrate active PII detection and removal, not just data masking. Should include multiple PII types and configurable policies.
Examples
PII detection algorithms
Automatic redaction features
Data anonymization tools
Privacy policy enforcement
Uptime & support SLAs
Contractual commitments to system availability and support response times with measurable guarantees.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide specific uptime percentages and support response time commitments. Look for SLA documentation and performance reporting.
Examples
99.9% uptime guarantees
24/7 support commitments
Response time SLAs
Performance dashboards
SOC2 Type II certified
Successfully completed SOC 2 Type II audit demonstrating operational effectiveness of security controls over time.
Evaluation Criteria
Must have valid SOC 2 Type II certification, not just SOC 2 Type I. Look for recent audit reports or compliance badges.
Examples
SOC 2 Type II certificates
Compliance page documentation
Third-party attestations
GDPR/HIPAA compliant options
Platform configurations and features that enable compliance with data privacy and healthcare regulations.
Evaluation Criteria
Must provide specific compliance features, not just general security. Look for data processing agreements, privacy controls, and compliance documentation.
Examples
Data processing agreements
Privacy control features
HIPAA business associate agreements
GDPR compliance guides
Enterprise Demo
See Inkeep Enterprise
Find a time with our Agent Solutions team to get an overview of Inkeep Enterprise and demo of Inkeep Agents for your use case.